(After watching the movie, I checked out its soundtrack.) The soundtrack's review concluded "the album is by and large a mediocre collection", but it was rated 4.5 stars? Many rating mismatches are arguable, but some are obvious mistakes.
We'll raise the alarm.
A Tribute to Hank Williams was rated 4.5 stars (I wish that a tribute would be so highly rated). However, the editor's review says: "Unfortunately, this compilation contains a lot of filler and lackluster renditions of Williams' songs." Two of its better songs "are decent".
This rating has been adjusted. Thanks for the heads-up.
Is a rewrite something the editorial team will consider? A ratings change seems like a quick job but editing text feels more time-consuming. As the OP mentions, there are many, MANY similar cases out there.
Honestly, rewriting a review of a budget compilation of Hank Williams songs or a 30-year-old soundtrack to a James Garner western are not going to be high priority tasks.
