reviewing reissues

Recently, I discovered a couple reviews of reissues that were overlooked by editors upon initial release.  Occasionally, an editor would also fully review a reissue (instead of appending a couple of sentences to the initial release's review).  These retrospective reviews aren't read by as many users as those reviewing new releases.

As lamented in reviewing a digital reissue: "Between major-label mergers and the fact that it just says 'Largo' on the cover, this flat-out masterpiece was lost in the shuffle and almost no one heard it."  If a tree falls in the forest and no one heard it, did it make a sound?  Sì largo, if a recording was made and discovered decades later via a written review of that recording's digital reissue!