2

The ratings aren't precise enough anymore

Back when you relaunched the site, you swapped out the written rating for the number of people who had rated the show. IIRC, it went from "Avg Rating 4.12" to "Avg Rating (2 319 ratings)"

I do appreciate the inclusion of that latter info, I was missing it as well.

But now, we just have the stars to get an idea of the quality of shows, and that's not precise enough.

When you're familiar enough with a site like Sidereel, you know how the userbase rates shows, and what those ratings mean to you.

For example, I personally am of the opinion that a few shows with a rating of 3.70 might be watchable, depending on their genre, but that anything under that is utter trash.

The problem is, right now, three and a half stars display for a whole gamut of shows, from the utterly unwatchable (3.30) to the potentially quite enjoyable (3.70).

So: do you think you could bring back the written rating while also keeping the number of ratings?

Thank you for your consideration.